I think it worth serious reflection that Judaism has never developed the doctrine of Original Sin from thousands of years of reading and interpreting it’s Bible, the Tanakh. The brilliant Roman Catholic historian Prof Paul Johnson, makes this clear in ‘A History of the Jews’ p161[1].
So
why is it that Christian theologians have read these same passages, such as Ps
51:5 and come to a very different conclusion?
I
believe it is because they approach the Hebrew Scriptures with a Platonic or
Hellenistic mindset, not a Hebraic one. This is how such false doctrines as
Calvin’s TULIP principles, the Trinity, going to heaven when you die, etc. all
developed.
One
of the most important Hebraic perspectives that is relevant here is the concept
of ‘Yetzer HaRa’ versus ‘Yetzer HaTov’ (the evil and good inclinations, or the
two hearts). This is what the Apostle Paul is speaking about in Romans 7 – I
discuss this principle in my Hebraic Mindset articles at www.circumcisedheart.info
So how should we read Ps 51:5?
Denis Bratcher, a Christian
theologian with a good grasp of the Hebraic mindset writes on Ps 51:5: ‘Indeed, I was born guilty, a sinner
when my mother conceived me.’
“This verse has traditionally been interpreted as teaching a
specific doctrine of original sin, what is known in systematic theology as the
genetic theory of the transmission of original sin. It began with those who
used the assumptions of Greek Neo-Platonic philosophy and read this verse from
the perspective of philosophical dualism. In this view, all physical matter is
inherently evil and therefore sin is located in the physical body.
Beginning with that perspective, this verse seems to confirm that human beings are sinful simply because they are born physically, that all human beings are guilty of sin simply because they exist as physical creatures. From that premise, it was easy for some to conclude that as long as human beings exist in a physical world they will always be sinful in every thought and action.
Beginning with that perspective, this verse seems to confirm that human beings are sinful simply because they are born physically, that all human beings are guilty of sin simply because they exist as physical creatures. From that premise, it was easy for some to conclude that as long as human beings exist in a physical world they will always be sinful in every thought and action.
But this is not a doctrine of original
sin…. To
adopt that view is to destroy human responsibility that is at the heart of this
Psalm!
Verse
five is simply a way to say that at this moment, as the Psalmist stands before
God in confession, maybe for the first time in his life, he is willing to say,
"I really am this bad." At this moment of honesty the psalmist has
come before God and finally admits, "I have never been much better than
who I am at this moment." “- see http://www.cresourcei.org/psa51.html
However, I believe a still better understanding of this verse is the
understanding from Judaism that King David was conceived in circumstances that
were not good; that were in some way sinful. This understanding is brilliantly disclosed
in this article by Chana Weisberg[2].
Here she argues that the Psalm is referring to the manner of King
David’s conception and that it has nothing to do with King David’s (sinful)
nature. I strongly recommend reading her article to get the full picture.
For a more in-depth look at the Original Sin doctrine I recommend
Frank Selch’s article. ‘Original Sin and the Fall of Adam’ – also downloadable
from www.circumcisedheart.info
[1] “… the Jews usually avoided the positive dogmas which
the vanity of theologians tends to create and which are the source of so much
trouble. They never adopted, for instance , the idea of Original Sin.
Of all the ancient peoples, the Jews were perhaps the least interested in death, and this saved them from a host of problems. It is true that belief in the resurrection ansd the afterlife was the main distinguishing mark of Pharisaism, and thus a fundament of rabbinic Judaism. Indeed the first definite statement of dogma in the whole of Judaism, in the Mishnah, deals with this: ‘All Israel share in the world to come except the one who says resurrection has no origin in the Law’. But the Jews had a way of concentrating on life and pushing death – and its dogmas – into the background.”
Of all the ancient peoples, the Jews were perhaps the least interested in death, and this saved them from a host of problems. It is true that belief in the resurrection ansd the afterlife was the main distinguishing mark of Pharisaism, and thus a fundament of rabbinic Judaism. Indeed the first definite statement of dogma in the whole of Judaism, in the Mishnah, deals with this: ‘All Israel share in the world to come except the one who says resurrection has no origin in the Law’. But the Jews had a way of concentrating on life and pushing death – and its dogmas – into the background.”
No comments:
Post a Comment